The Dilemma of Zlibrary: Empowering Students or Enabling Piracy?

As the year 2022 came to a close, a significant event occurred that may have gone unnoticed by many. The famous online repository of ebooks and articles, Z-library, was shut down. This event serves as a reminder of how too much attention can have negative consequences. In this blog post, we will delve deeper into the story of Zlibrary and the issues surrounding shadow libraries, intellectual property rights, and access to knowledge.

 

The Impact of Digitized Info: The Rise of Z-library

Z-library is an online repository of ebooks and articles that provides free access to information and knowledge. The site started in 2009 and has since grown to be one of the largest shadow libraries on the internet. According to Fast Company:

"Z-Library offered more than 10 million ebooks and 86 million articles at its peak, with a limited number of monthly downloads accessible to millions of users free of charge, and more available for a small fee."

Many people around the world rely on such resources as they may need access to the expensive subscription-based services that are often required to access academic articles and books. Proponents of websites like Zlibrary, Sci-Hub, and Libgen argue that they strive to break down barriers to knowledge and education, enabling users to access the information they need to learn and grow.

The TikTok Effect on Zlibrary: More Popularity, More Problems

The rising popularity of Z-library, however, attracted the scrutiny of copyright holders and legal authorities, putting both the site and its users in a vulnerable position. The increased attention also raised legal questions about using such a resource.

 According to TorrentFreak, Z-library has emerged as a vastly popular, high-volume source of illegal ebook downloads in recent years. The site's growth can be attributed to users who openly advertise the site on social media, with TikTok playing a significant role in its popularity. The hashtag #zlibrary on the popular social media platform has 4 million views, with countless videos posted by college and high school students and others across the world promoting it as the go-to place for free ebooks.

However, the attention that Zlibrary received on TikTok was a double-edged sword. While it certainly helped spread the word about the site, it also brought more attention to its illegal activities. This attracted the attention of copyright holders and legal authorities, namely the FBI.

Starving Students vs Starving Artists: Who really benefits from the closure of Z-library?

According to the Washington Post, the FBI has charged two Russian nationals, Anton Napolsky and Valeriia Ermakova, with criminal copyright infringement, wire fraud and money laundering for operating Z-Library. The authorities took down the website on November 4th and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Breon Peace, stated that the defendants profited illegally by uploading works within hours of publication and victimized authors, publishers, and booksellers in the process.

The Washington Post also noted how authors and users had a clash of opinions. Users were mourning the loss of their ability to download free textbooks, novels, and academic papers. However, authors were relieved by the shutdown as they argued that piracy harms their sales and the publishing industry and that mourning Z-library is mourning the end of theft.

But is this really a debate between starving students and starving artists? Not really.

According to a report by Citigroup obtained by Rolling Stone, in the music industry's digital streaming era, the people who make the most money from copyrighted content like books or music are not the artist/author, but the holder of the copyright. They take nearly 90% of the money.

The story of Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the authors of the original Superman comic book, highlights the unfortunate reality that creators of copyrighted content may not always receive fair compensation for their work. Despite the immense success and wealth generated by Superman and the concept of superheroes, the inventors only received a small sum of $130 for signing over the rights to their creation to D.C. Comics. This has led to ongoing legal battles, with the families of the inventors seeking their fair share of the fortune generated by the invention. Of course, the copyright holders won.

The Z-library Takedown: Can we just dismiss the concern of students?  

One tweet succinctly summed up the students' feelings, stating "The closure of Zlibrary is like the burning of the Library of Alexandria in our time." This tweet draws parallels between the loss of this online library and the historical burning of the Library of Alexandria during the reign of Julius Caesar.

Burning Z-Library: Rendered by Stable Diffusion 2.1

Can we just dismiss this as students being overly emotional? Well, it's more complicated than that.

As noted in the Huntington News, a 2014 study found that the average cost of a college textbook is about $105, which is difficult to justify for most college students. In the same study, 65% of college students said they didn't purchase their required textbooks even though they knew it could hurt their grade.

The burden of student debt is heavy for many young people in Canada and the U.S. In Canada, the total amount of student loans owed to the federal government reached a staggering $22.3 billion in 2020. And this figure doesn't even consider provincial and personal loans, lines of credit and education-related credit-card debt. On average, a Canadian student graduating with a bachelor's degree holds $28,000 in student loan debt, while college grads hold $15,300 in debt. In the U.S., the situation is similarly dire. For 2023, the total amount of student loan debt (including federal and private loans) has reached $1.75 trillion. The average student borrower holds $28,950 in debt.

The situation in Canada and the U.S. has a wide-reaching social impact, as this debt load can make it difficult for young people to start their careers, buy homes, or even save for retirement. It is clear that the cost of education is a growing concern not just for students but for society as a whole.

Consequently, the Z-library debate must be connected to the economic reality that students face, such as the rising costs of education, high levels of student debt, and a lack of affordable access to educational resources. It highlights how the students' anger at the site's shutdown is a part of a broader crisis they face. It is essential to understand this context when discussing the issues surrounding shadow libraries and intellectual property rights.

Digital Tech: Innovation and the Struggle for a Knowledge Society

The Z-library debate highlights how intellectual property can be an obstacle to creating a knowledge society. From a technological standpoint, the ability to digitize text, information, and knowledge can revolutionize access to information and education. However, as demonstrated by Zlibrary, the economic realities of the publishing industry and the protection of intellectual property rights often stand in the way of this potential. Technology has advanced, but the economics have not evolved to keep pace, resulting in the same exploitative dynamics seen in other industries such as music and comics. To truly create a knowledge society, we must re-examine how intellectual property laws and systems can be adapted to enable access to information and knowledge for all rather than just protecting the profits of a select few.

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else.

The Terminator in the Kitchen: How Robots are Changing the World of Fast Food

As we continue to digest the impact of ChatGPT on the world of work, CNBC had an interesting video on how robots are ready to replace humans in the kitchen:

As noted in the report, the industry is poised to save $12 billion in labour costs by replacing "up to 82% of restaurant positions... by robots." The video also highlights the safety benefits that could accrue to fast-food workers with the use of robots. Coincidentally, I was chatting last week with a barista at Starbucks. He mentioned an unfortunate incident where his friend fell into an oil vat while cleaning the equipment. This was not at a small restaurant, but a major one. Finally, the video speaks to the labour crunch that the industry is facing. With over half a million positions to be filled, robots could be the answer restauranteurs are looking for. 

Other advantages include the following:

• Improved hygiene: Given the impact of COVID-19, many people now view the idea of reducing human involvement in food preparation as a way to ensure a more hygienic end product.
• Consistency: By using robots for food preparation, restaurants can ensure that customers receive consistently high-quality food. This can avoid dissatisfied customers, who have had to consume burnt offerings!
• Reduced food wastage: Systems can be designed to avoid food wastage and capture excess toppings, etc., to be reused. 

In terms of cost, Miso rents these out:

"Miso’s flashiest invention is Flippy, a robot that can be programmed to flip burgers or make chicken wings and can be rented for roughly $3,000 a month."

What I found fascinating was how we have been preconditioned by sci-fi movies to expect humanoid robots. Instead, we find an awfully familiar-looking contraption: a rail-car system with a camera and mechanical arm attached. It's pretty similar to what we have seen before in terms of how robots are being used to make lattes, as discussed in this post. 

But there is more to the contraption than ‘meets the eye’. The value ultimately is in the software that can bring all the moving parts together. As noted by Mike Bell, CEO of Miso Systems, who manufactures the "frying robot" (taken from the YouTube transcript): 

"The hard thing to get right about this product is having the computer vision, the algorithms that plan the cook cycle and the software that manages the robotic motion to all work together so that it's as reliable as a refrigerator and it does the job."

In conclusion, the food industry is looking to save billions of dollars in labour costs by replacing restaurant workers with robots. Though this would save mountains of money we need to look at the society wide impact of such a monumental shift. Personally, working in the fast food industry as a young person taught me a lot before entering the CPA profession, such as the importance of hard work, humility, and empathy. Without such work, where would the youth of today or tomorrow learn such basics? Only time will tell what this means for the future generations that don't have access to such formative experiences.

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else

Welcome to 2023! What are five key tech trends that CPAs should be aware of?

With the crypto-ice age in effect, there is some rethinking on crypto and NFTs path in 2023. Here is CNBC's take: 

However, there are still a number of key tech trends that Chartered Professional Accountants (CPAs) should be aware of in order to stay up-to-date and competitive in the industry. These trends include cloud computing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, big data, cybersecurity, and digital transformation. By understanding and leveraging these technologies, CPA firms can improve their operations and better serve their clients.

1. Cloud Computing: Cloud computing involves delivering computing services, including servers, storage, and databases, over the internet rather than using local servers or personal devices. CPA firms can benefit from cloud computing by being able to access data and applications from any location, as well as scaling up or down as needed. For more on cloud and the world of CPAs, check out this post. 

2. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and machine learning technologies can help CPA firms automate routine tasks, improve decision-making, and gain insights from data. For example, chatbots are now able to generate fully coherent posts using natural-language processing. We covered this in our last post, with the rise of ChatGPT. If you haven't checked it out, it is must read. 

3. Big Data: Businesses are generating and collecting a large amount of data from a variety of sources, including financial transactions, social media, and internet of things (IoT) devices. Tools such as data visualization and advanced analytics can help CPA firms make sense of this data and extract valuable insights. In the early days of big data, I put this post together. It captures the hope and potential - much of which still needs to be realized.

4. Cybersecurity: Cybersecurity is a critical concern for CPA firms, as they often handle sensitive financial and personal data. It is important for CPA firms to have robust cybersecurity measures in place to protect against cyber threats such as hacking, ransomware, and phishing attacks. I've always felt that Cyber is a natural extension for CPAs. We're not just versed in the concept of controls, but also the realities of auditing those controls - an increasingly important way of conveying of compliance to a variety of stakeholders. See here for CPA Canada's list of resources.

5. Digital Transformation: Digital transformation refers to the use of digital technologies to fundamentally change how an organization operates and delivers value to its customers. CPA firms can benefit from digital transformation by streamlining processes, improving efficiency, and increasing agility. This may involve adopting new technologies such as cloud computing, AI, and big data, as well as rethinking business models and organizational structures. See here for more on the topic. 

In closing, it is important for CPA firms to stay informed about the latest tech trends in order to take advantage of new opportunities and meet the changing needs of their clients. By embracing technologies such as cloud computing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, big data, cybersecurity, and digital transformation, CPA firms can improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and competitive edge. By staying up-to-date with these trends, CPA firms can continue to deliver value to their clients and succeed in an increasingly digital business environment.

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else

AI and the CPA: OpenAI's ChatGPT will Blow Your Mind! Try it Now!

We previously discussed OpenAI in this post. In that post, I closed with this comment:

"We should be aware of the concept of exponential change. Technology, like AI, improves at an exponential rate and not a linear rate. Consequently, monitoring the space is key for CPAs and other to ensure that they see change coming and adapt accordingly."

And so, my fellow CPAs, you need to check out how much AI has advance in the two years since that post. It's absolutely amazing to see how advanced the technology is and how quickly it has come:

YouTube is one thing. But testing it out is another. To be honest, I was about to review the video and then summarize it. Then I thought, why not ask ChatGPT? 

Question to ChatGPT: "What are 5 key takeaways for CPAs with respect to ChatGPT?"

Answer: 

1. ChatGPT is a large language model trained by OpenAI.
2. ChatGPT has a knowledge cutoff of 2021, and it does not have access to the internet or current events.
3. ChatGPT is able to generate human-like responses to a wide range of questions, but it is important to keep in mind that it is a machine and may not always provide accurate or complete information.
4. ChatGPT is not a substitute for professional advice or guidance, and it should not be used as the sole basis for making important decisions.
5. ChatGPT is intended for general informational purposes only, and it is not a substitute for professional judgment or expertise. It is important for CPAs to consult with appropriate sources and to exercise their professional judgment when making decisions.

Reading through the takeaways, it seems like it added an extra dash of risk management. Could it have accounted for our risk-aversion?

Then I thought, why not ask it directly about the video itself? 

Question to ChatGPT: "What are 5 key takeaways from It’s Time to Pay Attention to A.I. (ChatGPT and Beyond)"

Answer:

1. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field with the potential to significantly impact many aspects of society, including the accounting profession.
2. AI technologies, such as chatbots and language models like ChatGPT, are becoming increasingly sophisticated and can be used for a wide range of applications.
3. It is important for CPAs to stay informed about the latest developments in AI and to consider how these technologies may impact their profession and their clients.
4. While AI has the potential to improve efficiency and accuracy, it is important to carefully consider the risks and limitations of these technologies, including the potential for errors or biases.
5. CPAs should consider ways to incorporate AI into their practices, such as by using AI tools to automate certain tasks or by providing guidance to clients on the use of AI. However, they should also ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively use and understand these technologies.

Notice how I did not have to tailor this questions for CPAs? ChatGPT automatically brought the context over from the previous question.  (As for how good this summary is, you can judge for yourself.)

Then, I decided to ask it about how exponential technologies will impact the CPA profession. 

First question, "Will blockchain replace the need for financial auditors?"

Answer:

"Blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of the financial industry, including auditing. However, it is unlikely that blockchain will completely replace the need for financial auditors.

One of the main features of blockchain is its ability to provide a tamper-evident record of transactions. This can be beneficial for auditing purposes, as it allows auditors to more easily verify the accuracy and completeness of financial records. However, auditors still need to be able to interpret and analyze the data contained in these records, and to ensure that the data is consistent with other information and documentation.

Additionally, while blockchain can provide a secure and reliable record of transactions, it is not a substitute for the expertise and judgment of trained financial professionals. Auditors bring a deep understanding of financial principles and practices, as well as the ability to identify and assess risks and potential areas of concern.

Overall, it is likely that blockchain will augment and enhance the role of financial auditors, rather than replacing them entirely."

Notice the nuanced response? It should have spoke to validity, instead of completeness when it came to how the blockchain will assist the auditor. However, it didn't just list all the audit objectives just "to be safe". 

Then I asked about artificial intelligence:

Question: "How can AI be used to automate financial auditing?"

Answer:

"Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to automate certain aspects of financial auditing, such as the analysis and interpretation of financial data. This can potentially improve the efficiency and accuracy of the audit process.

For example, AI algorithms can be trained to analyze large amounts of financial data and identify patterns and trends that may not be immediately apparent to human auditors. This can help auditors to more quickly and effectively identify areas of potential risk or concern.

AI can also be used to automate the testing of transactions and the evaluation of internal controls. For example, an AI system could be trained to perform automated tests on transactions to ensure that they are recorded correctly in the financial records. This can help to reduce the time and resources needed to perform these tasks manually.

Overall, the use of AI in financial auditing can help to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the audit process, while also freeing up auditors to focus on more complex and higher-level tasks that require human judgment and expertise."

Recognize the theme of "race with the machine" in both this response and the previous blockchain response? This is especially integrated into the last paragraph, which speaks to what AI can do versus what "human judgment and expertise" can do. Also, notice how it explains AI role in both risk assessment and testing of internal controls. That is, it had enough where "understanding" to breakdown the response into different aspects of the audit. 

When looking at this, we need to ask ourselves: is this inflection point for exponential rise of AI? 

Do review the last part of the video, where Samuel H. Altman, CEO of OpenAI, explains how he anticipates the impact of such technology on the legal profession. (The video earlier takes about how Josh Browder's Do Not Pay, will leverage the tech. I had previously seen Browder on a panel in 2016; see this post for the video). 

It's not quite a stretch to apply what he says to the CPA profession. There are key differences; in that we opine on financial statements, provide tax advice based on financial data, and the like. However, audit data analytics tech has been around for decades. It's just a matter of getting the different parts to talk to each other. 

Clearly, it's early days for ChatGPT and many issues need to be sorted out. For example, it has already earned the moniker "CheatGPT" for how it can be potentially used as a short-cut by students. That being said, it's clearly the biggest watershed moment for AI and the white-collar workforce, since IBM's Watson defeated Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter. 

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else

Figuring out FTX (Part 3): 5 Videos You Must Watch on SBF’s Arrest!

Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was scheduled to testify in front of congress on Tuesday. Forbes caught a copy of his testimony, which is available here.  However, this testimony won’t be delivered. Instead, SBF got arrested in the Bahamas. The US Department of Justice (DoJ), in a joint conference with the SEC and CFTC, unveiled the following 8 charges:

• Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud on Customers
• Wire Fraud on Customers
• Conspiracy To Commit Wire Fraud on Lenders
• Wire Fraud on Lenders
• Conspiracy to Commit Commodities Fraud
• Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud
• Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering
• Conspiracy to Defraud the United States and Violate the Campaign Finance Laws

 

CryptoSlate reported that “the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have both filed separate charges against the ex-CEO…The SEC has charged SBF with offering securities for sale and selling securities for fraud. Specifically, the charges fall under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933 pertaining to anti-fraud provisions…Further, the CFTC charged SBF with fraudulent misstatements and omissions.” 

 

The SEC complaint is available here (and here is their press release). The CFTC’s complaint is available here (and here is their press release). The full press conference is available here.

 

Video #1 – Will SBF’s Ill Advised Media Tour contribute to his Downfall?

Since the November collapse, SBF has been giving interviews (e.g. NYTimes, ABC, WSJ, BBC). This is of course against the advice of counsel.  Regardless, he has been talking up a storm, claiming to be the incompetent CEO and then apologizing for his screwups. That is, he was able to successfully bob-and-weave during these interviews and avoid admission of fraud.

 

That was until he was interviewed by Coffeezilla.

 

Coffeezilla admitted he too got outmaneuvered when he attempted to pin him down here and here. However, by reviewing his mistake and the mistake of others, he cornered SBF in this video and got him to admit to the lack of segregation of funds:

 

 

SBF, in contrast to his other interviews, got annoyed and accused Coffeezilla of monopolizing the interview time. Coffeezilla easily refutes this claim, noting SBF was factually incorrect. That being said, it would be surprising if this interview is not captured as part of the evidence that the DoJ, SEC, and CFTC will ultimately use against SBF.

 

Video #2 – WSJ Overview on the Players and Places

The following gives a good overview of what is happening. This includes the jurisdictions involved, the charges laid, and the Congressional hearings that are occurring in parallel.

 

See here for Coffeezilla’s analysis of the charges. The video also includes commentary from Legal Eagle.  

 

Video #3 – Summary of the Criminality at FTX and Alameda

 

FTX’s CEO, John J. Ray III, testified before congress about his findings so far. Ray was the same CEO that managed the Enron bankruptcy and has previously said that he has never seen “a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred [at FTX]”. This video, from the Washington Post, seems to capture the essence of the criminality that was a foot at the crypto-exchange and the hedge fund:

 

 

Video #4 – Did the multi-Billion Dollar FTX use QuickBooks and Slack?

For the poor state of governance and controls, see Ray’s opening remarks during his congressional testimony:

 

And to answer the question, yes they did!

Video #5 – The Nature of Crypto is making it hard for Ray to Locate FTX’s Assets

 

Locating assets in a bankruptcy is usually a matter of following the paper trail. Admittedly, FTX has poor records as noted in the last video. However, the problem is compounded by the ethereal nature of crypto/digital assets. See WSJ’s summary of Ray’s testimony, which highlights this unique challenge within FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings:

 

 The FTX story continues to evolve. There is definitely more to discuss, as additional details come to light. However, another story that will be explored in future post(s) is the contagion that has spread through the crypto-verse due to FTX and the other collapses in the nascent industry.

 

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else.

 

Figuring out FTX (Part 2): The Ten Days In November that Brought FTX Down

In our last post, we looked at the epic rise of SBF and FTX. In this post, we examine the Ten Days of November that shook FTX to its core and resulted in its spectacular collapse.

Post #1: The CoinDesk FTX Timeline

The best place to start is this timeline, which is taken from this CoinDesk post. I’ve also added the amount withdrawn from FTX, which was taken from this Reuters article:

Post #2: The Leaking of the Alameda Balance Sheet

What must be said, the much vaunted transparency of the blockchain did not bring down the FTX empire. Instead, it was classic journalism at CoinDesk. The killer quote from the article:

“That balance sheet is full of FTX – specifically, the FTT token issued by the exchange that grants holders a discount on trading fees on its marketplace. While there is nothing per se untoward or wrong about that, it shows Bankman-Fried’s trading giant Alameda rests on a foundation largely made up of a coin that a sister company invented, not an independent asset like a fiat currency or another crypto. The situation adds to evidence that the ties between FTX and Alameda are unusually close.”

As noted in the above timeline, this is what prompted Changpeng Zhao (CZ) to tweet this and then caused the billions to be withdrawn, as mentioned in the Reuters article.

Post #3: Prelude to the FTX Collapse

The first of Coffeezilla’s video on the collapse really captures not just the rivalry between SBF and CZ, but the killer-business logic that was potentially at play. Far from the crypto-utopian visions of an egalitarian ecosystem, we see the same sort of cutthroat competition in the banking world itself. For example, one theory holds that Bear-Stearns collapse was triggered in the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis. The reason? Payback. Bear-Stearns did not help out in the Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) bailout and so Goldman-Sachs returned the favour almost 20 years to the day.  

Post #4: FTX and the Mystery of the Stolen Crypto

This video, published 3 days after the last, explores the complex web of relationships that is FTX (far more complex than Lehman), but zooms in on the entanglement between Alameda Research and FTX. The big reveal here is that an Alameda insider noted that “not only did they [Alameda Research] have access to FTX's back end [but] they [also] managed withdrawals for FTX and had a giant line of credit that they could draw on, which seems like partially may have been users funds something that no separate entity would normally have”.  The insider was corroborated by the Wall Street Journal.

Post #5: An Inside Look at the Chaos and Ineptitude at FTX/Alameda

Shout out to Tim Bauer for passing on this link from MilkyEggs! (Bloomberg’s Matt Levine, also referred to the post here with all the necessary caveats). It gives more details around the sheer chaos and ineptitude that existed at FTX and Alameda. With respect to the chaos, it gives some details around SBF’s mental state. It is quite the contrast to the image that was portrayed to the outside world, which we saw in the first video in the last post. With respect to ineptitude, it highlights the “farcically simplistic” accounting records the company kept.  

In terms of the top three takeaways, it firstly casts doubts on the origin story of SBF. The post alleges (based on an insider) that SBF quickly lost all the wealth he made from those bitcoin US vs Japan arbitrage trades. Secondly, it gives some insight into the inordinate amount of risk SBF was taking. Lastly, it attempts to breakdown the losses incurred by FTX-Alameda. That is, they attempt to piece together where the money - $15.5 billion in total – was spent. Also, do check out the postscript where they “found” another $3 billion in losses. Of course, this is not an official audit or anything like that. However, it’s nice to get a more wholistic understanding of the FTX-Alameda situation – beyond the puff pieces in the mainstream press.

In our next post, we will begin exploring the aftermath of FTX collapse.

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else.

 

Figuring out FTX and SBF (Part 1): The Epic Rise in 5 videos

The recent weeks have seen the fall of crypto-king Sam Bankman-Fried (aka SBF). The epic rise and the spectacular fall of him and his FTX empire has us all asking one question: what happened?

We’ll initially explore this saga over several posts. 

 

In this post, we look at 5 videos that cover the rise of SBF and his FTX crypto-exchange. We’ll start by looking at how he initially got rich through arbitrage trading, look at the FTX “business model”, his connections to the US government, and then close with the celebrity endorsements that helped propel him to stardom.

 

Video #1: The Benevolent Billionaire?

Probably my first encounter with SBF, was in his interview with Nas Daily. We learn how SBF rose to fame in the crypto space by taking advantage of price differences in bitcoin in the US and in Japan. More importantly, the video captures the hope and the hype around the “earn to give” concept that SBF promoted. Turns out it was all hype and no hope. Vox published their twitter DMs with SBF, where he explains “I feel bad for those who get f***** by it…this dumb game we woke westerners play where we say all the right shiboleths [sic] and so everyone likes us” (link).

 

 

Video #2: Did SBF really say that Crypto is a Ponzi Scheme – 7 months ago?

On Bloomberg’s Odd Lot’s podcast aired back in April 2022, SBF seems to admit to Wall Street’s Wiseman Matt Levine that “magic internet money” is a Ponzi scheme. If you don’t have time to listen to the whole podcast, check out Coffeezilla’s quick takes. The technique that SBF discusses appears to  have been used in Celsius, which we discussed previously.  

 

 

Video #3: There are magic boxes, but magic business models?

On a separate but related note, FTX offered high rates of interests to depositors. As shown in Wall Street Millennial’s video, the rates were much higher than the fed rate that was close to zero at the time. This is not so much about the magic money box that SBF referred to in the previous video, but rather pure magic. How else can we explain the sustainability of such a high interest rate on bitcoin/Ethereum deposits? As CPAs know, when expenses exceed revenues – a business failure is inevitable.  (Click here to go to the timestamp where they discuss the issue of interest rate deposits)

 

Video #4: If you’re for regulations, you’re one of the good guys – right?

Stepping back, Cold Fusion’s video gives a good broad understanding of the key events that happened with the rise and sudden fall of FTX. (The previous video is also quite good as well). That being said, this video takes time to highlight SBF’s connection with the government and regulatory bodies.

 

Firstly, his mom is connected to the Democratic party. Secondly, he testified before congress, donated to both parties (not just the Democrats), and met with Gary Gensler from the SEC. If you look carefully at the screen shot where he speaks about the meeting with Gensler, you may recognize IEX’s Brad Katsuyama. (Reuters reported here on this meeting). He’s the protagonist of Michael Lewis’s Flash Boys. And that’s not the only connection to Lewis. Reports have emerged that Lewis had spent 6 months with SBF and is planning to publish a book about him. Lastly, there is an odd connection between FTX’s CEO, Caroline Ellison, and Gary Gensler. As Cold Fusion points out, Caroline’s father, Glenn Ellison, was Gensler’s boss at MIT.

 

Video #5: Is FTX a smart bet, with all these celeb endorsements?

Both Wall Street Millennial and Cold Fusion pointed out the role of influencers played in pumping the FTX/SBF brand name. But we don’t just need to take their word for it. We can see it for ourselves. Some of the promo videos are still live on FTX’s YouTube Channel. This video features Canada’s own Kevin O’Leary:

If you didn’t have a chance to go through the whole video, check out this part where he and the host emphasize the compliance-orientation of SBF and FTX. Now, that definitely didn’t age well. But perhaps what’s more surprising is O’Leary’s comments post-FTX meltdown. Apparently, he would back SBF in another crypto-venture (link).

 

Lastly, if you are interested in seeing the actual adverts aired on TV, check out this one featuring the actor Larry David.

 

In our next post, we’ll look at some more videos that take a closer look at the “Ten Days in November” that broke FTX and could have possibly ushered in the “Crypto Ice Age”.

Author: Malik Datardina, CPA, CA, CISA. Malik works at Auvenir as a GRC Strategist that is working to transform the engagement experience for accounting firms and their clients. The opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent UWCISA, UW, Auvenir (or its affiliates), CPA Canada or anyone else.